buisiness law: Multiple Choices

Business Law Name: Course: Professor Name: (November 26, 2012) Case 1 Multiple Choices: b In most cases courts can’t exercise power of they do not have control over the body of the defendant or something that substitutes the defendant. Thus it is a notion that the power and the ability to adjudicate lies on the power of the given court to execute. a It is not possible for Jones to transfer the case to his own federal court because the incident of the injustice took place in another federal state and thus the Mexican federal court is the one that has the jurisdiction over the case since it took place in its state. Both b and c Windell Travel and Windel Hotel cannot claim not to have contract with Jennifer because her minor in the business does not have any effect on the agency’s relationship with Windell. Consequently the advert of both Windell travel and hotel use Jennifer tours as the travel agency in their adverts so they have to be responsible for any injuries. a Further it can be claimed that this is the solution since sole proprietorship is any person doing business and since the business was transferred to Jennifer she is the one to be sued. Further a sole proprietorship is recognized as a legal entity that is separate from its owners. All of the above. Jones is legible to get all his money back including the ad-on since the advertisement and the website created an express warranty that stated the expenses of the trip. Additionally Jones had entered on a contract based on the information that were available in the website meaning that the fact that Jones found it later to be untrue was intentional and that the Windell Tours and Windell Hotel knew it. Short Answer: He is likely to use the common law because it involves negligence of their duties (Balkin, 2012). It is true that once the common law does not allow the revoking of the option contract and thus in its use it would make Jones receive justice on the wrongs done to him from Windell Tr...