Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Employment law for business

Case Study Instructions:
Grading of written cases will be based on the quality of organization, clarity of explanations, practicality of recommendations, quality of illustrations and exhibits (if any), grammar, spelling and APA format. 1. REFERENCE: EMPLOYMENT LAW FOR BUSINESS by Dawn Bennett-Alexander and Laura P. Hartman (7TH EDITION): Chapter 4., Employment Law for Business will help you with this case. 2. Study Case 2, on page 194-195, National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab, 489 U.S. 656 (1989). UPLOADED. 3. Answer the questions at the end of the case #1,2. Justify your answers by using the book and other references as guidance for your conclusions. Thank you.
Case Study Sample Content Preview:

EMPLOYMENT LAW FOR BUSINESS
Name:
Institution:
In the fourth amendment of the United States, the bill grants the employees the freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures by government officials. The bill states that warrants should be issued only in probable cause that is in the support of an oath and it should describe the place of search, people and the items that the officers should search or seize. The right further seeks to protect two major liberty interests; the employees’ right to liberty and their freedom from uninformed incursions. The officers, who are to conduct the search or the seizure, must obtain a warrant from a law court (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2012). This would grant them the right to search and seize people, their property and items. Furthermore, they have to describe what, where and whom they want to search and or seize. However, the court has to examine the matter and the relevance of the search. In addition, there is need for government to conduct tests and searches to employees seeking promotion or employment into places that they will come into contact with drugs and in the customs sector.
In as much as the individuals’ rights are important, there is need to balance the individuals’ rights of privacy with the government’s special needs that are beyond the normal law enforcement. It appears that the drug-testing program for the customs service does not to meet the needs of the enforcement of the law. The reason is that the results of the urine testing that done by the government on the employees would not be necessary for prosecution where there is no employee’s consent. The program’s main purpose is to control the drug use by those people who seek promotion or to hold sensitive positions in efforts to minimize chances of promoting dr...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!