Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
1 page/β‰ˆ275 words
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
APA
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.32
Topic:

Law of Unilateral and Mutual Mistake

Case Study Instructions:

You are an avid collector and painter of watercolors. You enjoy visiting all of the local and regional art galleries and, routinely, you purchase work of copies of the masters. One evening, at a local gallery, you make an offer to purchase what you are told is an autographed print of a locally famous watercolor artist. The painting is framed in glare- free argon gas glass. You pay $500.00 for the print and glass. 
The next evening the gallery director calls you and frantically explains that you actually purchased an original work by the artist, not the autographed print you thought you purchased. The original painting, in your possession, is worth at least $10,000.00. The gallery director asks that you return the painting, but also informs you that there exists no more autographed prints to sell to you. When you hesitate to return the painting without receiving at least the autographed print, the gallery director threatens you by stating that if you do not return the painting, she will inform all of the art galleries in the state of your refusal and ask that none of the galleries sell to you in the future. 
Aswer the questions below:
-In this transaction, how does the law of unilateral and mutual mistake apply. 
-What about the notion of fraud? 
-The gallery provided you with an express guarantee of authenticity of the autographed print and frame. Did the gallery provide what it guaranteed? 
-What about the element of duress? 
-Is the gallery director potentially liable to the defense of duress if you agree to rescind the contract and return the painting (and hopefully receive a return of the monies you paid).

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Law of unilateral and mutual mistake
Name
Course
Instructor
Date
Law of unilateral and mutual mistake
The concept of mistake is related to errors in understanding fact andlaw. A unilateral mistake occurs when a party has an incorrect belief related to either a law or fact of a contract (Adamson, 2012). On the other hand, a mutual mistake occurs when both parties to a contract have incorrect information about a factor or law (Adamson, 2012). In this case, there was no mutual mistake, since the information provided by the curator was believed to be true. The art collector relied on the information from the gallery director. The seller would need to show evidence that the buyer knew of the mistake and that he remained silent, if his claim against the buyer are to be believed.
Notion of fraud 
The notion of fraud would have been present if there was a false representation of fact intended to deceive the buyer. However, in this case, the guaranteed that the artwork was a genuine autographed print. Even though, there was a mistake on the part of the seller, there was no intent to defraud the buyer.
Guarantee of authenticity
The gallery did not provide what i...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!