PharmaSim Case Study

PharmaSim
Name:
Institution:
Group B’s report is the one that stands out from the three groups. When compared to group C, Group B has detailed the various sections with articulate illustrations that show the various parameters and how they either played out on the market, the competition and the company products. Group C on the other hand hands out a generally illustrated report where all the aspects are bundled together in long sentences. The order of the various section required in the report after simulation in Group C are all flowing into one, with vaguely established paragraphs to symbolize the transitions and specificity of the inform carried therein. For group B, the report is well detailed with section of the simulation easily established for the readers to follow through the content. The transitions are also present, making sure that the readers can connect the various aspects between topics. However it is also crucial to note that, they both have content that is accurate, with group using much simpler illustrations to bring about their point.
Although group C does use long sentences, the message is much easier to understand, that group B which is more technical and blunt. It is also important to note that, group B does use a lot of graphs as would be expected in such an analysis, while group c uses only one which appears at the end of the paper. Graphs are an easy way to help the readers understand the content and break the monotony of prose enhancing understanding. In light of the content presentation, Group when compared to group B, does come out quite clearly as would be expected. All the subtopics of the simulation are well represented much like they are presented by group B, with articulate headings. Unlike group B however, group D use...