Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
10 pages/β‰ˆ2750 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 48.6
Topic:

The Facilities are Characterized by Treatment Variations

Case Study Instructions:

M4 – SLP Running head: Health Information Systems Acquisition and Implementation
HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACQUISITION AND IMPLEMENTATION
Create a workflow diagram of clinical and non-clinical data within an inpatient electronic medical record system. Include the departments for which this data would be captured and stored. For instance, chest x-ray reports would be captured in radiology department. You need to have a minimum of at least 10 data points. Make sure to explain the role of all data points. It is important that your data flows throughout your workflow diagram. For instance, you would not want your first data point to be the chest x-ray/radiology, then the next data point to be admissions (admission data would need to come first). You can create your workflow diagram using any workflow tool such as Smart Draw and Microsoft Word. You can also use PowerPoint if you prefer.
SLP Assignment Expectations
1. Provide a workflow diagram of clinical and non-clinical data within an inpatient EHR. You need to have at least 10 data points with the associated department for which the data is collected/stored.
2. Provide an introduction and conclusion paragraph where you discuss the importance of these data points.
3. Your references and citations should be consistent with a particular formatting style such as APA.
4. Provide references from at least (2)scholarly articles (peer-reviewed). Do not include information from non-scholarly materials such as wikis, encyclopedias, or www(dot)freearticles(dot)com (or similar websites). Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals: http://www(dot)angelo(dot)edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php.
5. For additional information on reliability of sources, review the following source:
Georgetown University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating internet resources. Retrieved from https://www(dot)library(dot)georgetown(dot)edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

The Facilities are Characterized by Treatment Variations
In the current age, healthcare facilities are seeking alternative ways the delivery quality and affordable care to patients. Despite this, the facilities are characterized by treatment variations, unsafe practices, and increased patient mortality rates across healthcare facilities. An emerging recommendation to address the challenges is the integration of information technologies to improve the quality of care and reduce the costs of healthcare services delivered. However, implementing information technologies requires a detailed plan with essential considerations for achieving primary targets and overall success. There are different requirements for successfully implementing health information technologies for quality improvement and cost reduction. Since most healthcare facilities are adopting clinical information systems, exploring the flow of clinical and non-clinical data in an inpatient electronic health system is necessary. The discussion begins from the provision of laboratory reports, through various data points, to the final stage of discharge after treatment, establishing a foundation for recovery.
Laboratory Report- Emergency Department
Laboratory reports are critical components in the patient’s disease management. The advancement of diagnostic procedures, equipment, and facilities facilitates diagnosis optimization and the development of efficient individual treatment plans (Harith et al., 2016). Further, the authors note an increase in the reliance on laboratory reports through the shift in the demand for critical service among physicians in different healthcare facilities. As healthcare facilities integrate information technology systems, including laboratory results is becoming commonplace. The automation of sharing information necessitates smooth sharing between providers and patients, optimizing the patients’ clinical outcomes. Most data available in the electronic systems across health facilities are generated from laboratory results. The information is available through the transmission from the on-site laboratory to the electronic systems in the facility (Kratz, 2016). Individuals with access to the reports can access other critical details, including the time and date of the collection and release of results.
The best laboratory data should be supported by health information systems employed by independent laboratories that are mostly, though not continually, included in the inpatient EMR system. More specifically, laboratory data for inpatient EMR systems include lab results and orders. Accordingly, the coding requirements for lab results and lab orders include the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED), and the Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) (Gliklich et al., 2019). Today, there exists no compulsory lab coding system for inpatient EMRs, and many health care professionals depend on localized coding structures for lab results or orders. This constrains the multi-site EMR-derived lab information interoperability in the context of registries. Further, healthcare organizations might employ precise laboratory tests to assess a similar analyte, each incorporating a u...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!