History Of Modern Architecture And Interiors
A good description is a skill. How do you convey a full understanding of the project, what it looks like, how it functions, what is innovative, inventive, clever, successful about it, in a concise way? How do you mobilize analysis in feedback with a description, rather than as a two-part list? How do you include and mobilize visual information? How are images keyed into the text and allowed to complement the argument?
Select two projects (building or complex) to prepare as a case study:
1. Concisely and synthetically describe the projects—in formal, infrastructural, contextual, technical, technological, structural, material terms, etc., as appropriate.
2. Analyze the projects—discuss its significance both to the discipline and to your interests.
Consideration should be given to conceptual, theoretical, social, political, or cultural contexts. But foremost your analysis should discuss in what ways the project is productive to your work—what are the key ideas, techniques, forms, and so on you will take note of and mobilize in your work, and why—and in what ways might it hold limitations for you.
3. Compare and contrast the projects—are they from the same period or movement, or from different moments? What is their relationship: peer projects (related ideas, positions, and/or aesthetics), genealogical projects (one derives from the other), or competing projects (from differing, and/or antagonistic positions)? What is their relationship for you: why have you chosen these two projects, and how do they connect or contrast productively for you?
4. Develop a strategy for visual material. Pay attention to how the description is to become more than simple documentation—images and information are not to be simply illustrations to a description, but must be subjected to a process of analysis and retooling that develops a visual argument: their deployment must be designed. Use format to help you construct your argument—use it to structure and clarify your claims.
5. Give yourselves time to rework and edit the piece—this will be important. Remember, you are not simply describing the project, but discussing it: your aim is to produce an argument.
6. All sources used in the preparation of the assignment must be fully and accurately acknowledged in a bibliography and image credit list, and in footnotes where applicable (for all quotations, paraphrasing, references to key points in texts, or general references to texts).
You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to romeo and juliet:
- Fate In Romeo And Juliet: A Crucial Role2 pages/≈550 words | 6 Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Who Is Responsible For The Death Of Romeo And Juliet?2 pages/≈550 words | No Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- The Theme Of Death In Shakespeare's Romeo And Juliet3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- The Blame For The Deaths Of Romeo And Juliet3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- The Justification of Death in Hamlet Essay4 pages/≈1100 words | No Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Analysis Of Chike Agu’s Paper On Ideal And Functional Family Structure1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Writing Prompt Outline: Hamlet And Romeo And Juliet1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |