Health Informatics: Management Of Health Information

1) In reference to your proposed Database Design Proposal, consider a situation where you want to track (and ultimately reduce) the occurrences of a risk incident within the environment you selected.
2) Identify and select an incident in which you are interested. An example of an incident could be that which is acquired or occurred during hospital stays.
3) Develop a 750–1,000 word proposal from the perspective of the Health Information Manager, which includes a specification of the requirements, the proposed solution, the database design and/or modifications to existing databases, and a breakdown of responsibilities among staff to collect, analyze, and disseminate the information.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %
Module 3 Rubric: Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution
 
30.0 %
Proposal Components: Requirements, Solution, and Database Modifications
Description and assessment of the criteria are not outlined or outlined poorly. Fails to formulate clear possibilities for change.
Minimally outlines the rationale for the design chosen and lists limitations, and possible extensions. Ignores or superficially assesses areas of difficulty or modification needs for the database. Formulates vague and indecisive solutions.
Outlines the rationale for the solution, its requirements, limitations, and possible extensions. A surface level assessment of the areas of difficulty or modification of the database is offered. Expresses possible solutions. Minimal detail is used.
Describes the rationale for the solution, its requirements, limitations, and possible extensions Assessment is direct, competent, and appropriate of the areas of difficulty or modifications needed for the database. Formulates possible process changes or solutions. Some details are present.
Describes in-depth the rationale for the solution, its requirements, limitations, and possible extensions. Thoughtfully assesses and evaluates areas of difficulty or modification for the database. Formulates clear and precise process changes. Details and examples are present throughout.
20.0 %
Proposal Component: Breakdown of Responsibilities Among Staff to Collect, Analyze, and Disseminate the Information
Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident.
Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident.
Includes knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Includes essential knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples.
Covers topic in-depth with extensive details and examples.
10.0 %
Analysis
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the incident and draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Lacks supportive evidence and details.
Surface level of evaluation of the incident is offered. Minimal support for all components is presented.
Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the incident. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
Analyzes and evaluates incident from a critical perspective and draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.
20.0 %
Comprehension
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or timeliness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and rationales are clearly stated. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; rationales are clearly stated. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
10.0 %
Research
No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness.
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
5.0 %
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of "primer prose" indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
5.0 %
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
100 %
Total Weightage