Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
History
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.86
Topic:

Davidson's Position on Mismatch Expectations of Policymakers and Military

Coursework Instructions:

Provide a 250-350 word response to your instructor-assigned question,
QUESTION B: What do you make of Davidson’s argument that policy makers and the military have a mismatch of expectations? Consider your position on this issue as you support OR critique the argument made by scholars such as Ulrich that the US military requires more specific professional norms and guidelines to guide its advisory role in national security policymaking. Give reasons for your position and real-world examples. Specifically include in your answer some analysis of the dynamics that led to the breakdown in planning between the NSC, Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Strategic Air Command during the 1950s, as detailed in the assigned article by Matthew Jones.
__________________________________________________________
*Please see the course materials attached.
*When you place your in-text citation within the essay, please input your page number where you found the information. Example: (Hodges 2003, 176)., Hodges (2003, 176) discussed..., In a 2003 article, Hodges (176) discussed.

Coursework Sample Content Preview:

NATIONAL POLICYMAKERS AND THE INTERAGENCY PROCESS
Student’s Name
Course
Date
National Policymakers and the Interagency Process
Policymakers and the military tend to have a mismatch of expectations. This is a position taken by Davidson (2013, 131), who identifies three drivers of such mismatches: civil-military, institutional, and cultural. Davidson is right by arguing that the military and the policymakers have a mismatch of expectations. In many cases, the military plans for actions it considers to have the best military outcome. In other words, the military often plans for victory. On the other hand, the civilian planners have other considerations, most of which are political. Regardless of the possibility of winning a war, the president’s civilian advisors will consider such political consequences as responses by allies and potential friends.
Other scholars provide evidence of such a mismatch in expectations. For example, Ulrich (2021, 41) worries that civil-military relations must adhere to the foundational demographic principles rooted in the constitution to distribute and check political power. In this case, the difference...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These Chicago Coursework Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now