Functions of Writing (504 SLP)

Use the case 504 that you are doing (describing and classifying. references in order please This component of your SLP focuses upon the functions you will employ in your paper as identified in the Case Assignment for this module. For example, will your paper aim to describe, to compare and contrast, to classify, to explain cause/effect, or to present a particular argument? Or will it attempt some combination of these? Using your approved project topic, present an outline of your paper as a first step toward structuring your writing. Refer to “Sample Outlines” handout from the Background Information page of this module for guidance. The basic structure of your outline should be as follows: SLP Assignment Expectations Length: The written component of this assignment should be 2-3 pages long (double-spaced). References: At least eight references must be included from scholarly sources. Quoted materials should not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. Materials copied verbatim from external sources must be enclosed in quotation marks. In-text reference citations are required as well as a list of references at the end of the assignment. (APA format is required.) Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper according to the questions. Format: APA format is required for this assignment. Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted for minor errors, assignments are expected to adhere to standard guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity. The following items will be assessed in particular: Achievement of learning outcomes for this SLP assignment. Relevance—All content is connected to the question. Precision—Specific question is addressed. Statements, facts, and statistics are specific and accurate. Depth of discussion—Points that lead to deeper issues are presented and integrated. Breadth—Multiple perspectives and references, and multiple issues/factors are considered. Evidence—Points are well supported with facts, statistics, and references. Logic—Discussion makes sense; conclusions are logically supported by premises, statements, or factual information. Clarity—Writing is concise and understandable and contains sufficient detail or examples. Objectivity—Avoids the use of first person and subjective bias.