Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
7 pages/β‰ˆ1925 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 25.2
Topic:

Pressure Ulcer Prevention Essay

Essay Instructions:

Incorporating Theory
Incorporating Theory
Details:
1-Assignment - incorporating Theory
Identify a theory that can be used to support your proposed solution.
Write a summary (250-500 words) in which you:
1. Describe the theory and your rationale for selecting the theory.
2. Discuss how the theory works to support your proposed solution.
3. Explain how you will incorporate the theory into your project.
Refer to the "Topic 2: Checklist."
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Topic 2: Checklist
Review of Literature and Incorporating Theory
Instructions:
This checklist is designed to help students organize the weekly exercises/assignments to be completed as preparation for the final capstone project proposal. This checklist will also serve as a communication tool between students and faculty. Comments, feedback, and grading for modules 1-4 will be documented using this checklist.
Topic Task Completed Comments / Feedback Points
Review of Literature
• Analyze and appraise each of the 15 articles identified in module 1. (15 articles). _____ / 90
• Analysis organized using the sample provided in “Sample Format for Review of Literature.”
_____ / 10
Total _____/100
Incorporating Theory • Identified a theory that can be used to support proposed solution. _____ / 10
• Main components of theory described. _____ / 10
• Rationale for selecting theory provided. _____ / 10
• Discussed how theory works to support proposed solution.
_____ / 5
• Explained how theory will be incorporated into project. _____ / 5
Total _____/40 
2- Assignment- Review of the Literature 
Write a paper (1,500-2,000 words) in which you analyze and appraise each of the (15) articles identified in Topic 1. Pay particular attention to evidence that supports the problem, issue, or deficit, and your proposed solution.
Hint: The Topic 2 readings provide appraisal questions that will assist you to efficiently and effectively analyze each article.
Refer to "Sample Format for Review of Literature," "RefWorks," and "Topic 2: Checklist."
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Topic 2: Checklist
Review of Literature and Incorporating Theory
Instructions:
This checklist is designed to help students organize the weekly exercises/assignments to be completed as preparation for the final capstone project proposal. This checklist will also serve as a communication tool between students and faculty. Comments, feedback, and grading for modules 1-4 will be documented using this checklist.
Topic Task Completed Comments / Feedback Points
Review of Literature
• Analyze and appraise each of the 15 articles identified in module 1. (15 articles). _____ / 90
• Analysis organized using the sample provided in “Sample Format for Review of Literature.”
_____ / 10
Total _____/100
Incorporating Theory • Identified a theory that can be used to support proposed solution. _____ / 10
• Main components of theory described. _____ / 10
• Rationale for selecting theory provided. _____ / 10
• Discussed how theory works to support proposed solution.
_____ / 5
• Explained how theory will be incorporated into project. _____ / 5
Total _____/40 
1- Reference:
Samuriwo & Dowding. (2015, February 13). Nurses' pressure ulcer related judgements and decisions in clinical practice: A systematic review. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://eds(dot)b(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=3&sid=349f1e40-a50b-40eb-bc6d-348af36ef8d5@sessionmgr113&hid=111&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2012805452
2- Reference:
Waugh. (2014, November 14). Attitudes of Nurses Toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention: A Literature Review. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://eds(dot)b(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=349f1e40-a50b-40eb-bc6d-348af36ef8d5@sessionmgr113&hid=111&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZ
3 Reference:
Mahalingam,, Nageshwaran, & Bottomley. (2015, February 27). Improving pressure ulcer risk assessment and management using the Waterlow scale at a London teaching hospital. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/resultsadvanced?sid=eab9e2e8-23a6-4adc-9dfc-8c67c5c6f9f8@sessionmgr4004&vid=2&hid=4110&bquery=pressure ulcer&bdata=JmRiPWNjbSZjbGkwPUZUJmNsdjA9WSZjbGkxPUZSJmNsdjE9WSZjbGkyPVJWJmNsdjI9WSZjbGkzPUFBMSZjbHYzPVkmY2xpND1EVDEmY2x2ND0yMDEwMDEtMjAxNTEyJmNsaTU9TEExJmNsdjU9WSZ0eXBlPTEmc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZlJnNjb3BlPXNpdGU=
4- Reference:
Apostolopoulou,, Tselebis,, & Konstantinos;. (2014, August 1). Pressure ulcer incidence and risk factors in ventilated intensive care patients. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=eab9e2e8-23a6-4adc-9dfc-8c67c5c6f9f8@sessionmgr4004&hid=4110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2012637597
5- Reference:
Charlton,. (2014, October 31). Pressure ulcer grading and appropriate equipment selection. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=6&sid=eab9e2e8-23a6-4adc-9dfc-8c67c5c6f9f8@sessionmgr4004&hid=4110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2012750632
6 Reference:
Johansen,, & Van Etten,. (2014, September 5). Pressure ulcer risk assessment and prevention: What difference does a risk scale make? A comparison between Norway and Ireland. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=7&sid=eab9e2e8-23a6-4adc-9dfc-8c67c5c6f9f8@sessionmgr4004&hid=4110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2012673278
7- Reference:
Balzer,, & Junghans,. (2014, September 12). What patient characteristics guide nurses' clinical judgement on pressure ulcer risk? A mixed methods study. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=10&sid=eab9e2e8-23a6-4adc-9dfc-8c67c5c6f9f8@sessionmgr4004&hid=4110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2012533134
8- Reference:
Goodman,, & Washington. (2014, September 12). Factors in rehospitalisation for severe pressure ulcer care in spinal cord injury/disorders. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=12&sid=eab9e2e8-23a6-4adc-9dfc-
98c67c5c6f9f8@sessionmgr4004&hid=4110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2012592124
9- Reference: Elliott,. (2011, July 15). Applying pressure ulcer prevention theory to practice. Retrieved March 21, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=3&sid=d3eabf07-8978-49dc-b771-0b30ae9ffe5c@sessionmgr4002&hid=4208&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2011163697
10-- Reference :
Watson & Siang Choo. (2014, February 14). The effectiveness of nutritional intervention(s) and the treatment of pressure ulcers- A systematic literature review. Retrieved March 21, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=d3eabf07-8978-49dc-b771-0b30ae9ffe5c@sessionmgr4002&hid=4208&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2012006987
11- Reference: Chaves LM;. (2010, May 7). Protocols for pressure ulcer prevention: Are they evidence-based? Retrieved March 21, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=5&sid=d3eabf07-8978-49dc-b771-0b30ae9ffe5c@sessionmgr4002&hid=4208&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2010555773
12- Reference:
Flynn Makic,, & Will Poteet,. (2015, January 16). Examining the Evidence to Guide Practice: Challenging Practice Habits. Retrieved March 21, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=6&sid=d3eabf07-8978-49dc-b771-0b30ae9ffe5c@sessionmgr4002&hid=4208&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=201252790
13-Reference:
Clegg,, & , Simon. (2015, January 2). Elevation devices for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers: A review. Retrieved March 21, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=7&sid=d3eabf07-8978-49dc-b771-0b30ae9ffe5c@sessionmgr4002&hid=4208&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2012792702
14- Reference:
Meesterberends, & ; Lohrmann C;. (2010, July 16). Pressure ulcer guideline development and dissemination in Europe. Retrieved March 21, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=8&sid=d3eabf07-8978-49dc-b7710b30ae9ffe5c@sessionmgr4002&hid=4208&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2010658628
15- Whitlock,. (2013, October 11). SSKIN bundle: Preventing pressure damage across the health-care community... Surface, Skin inspection, Keep moving, Increased moisture management, Nutrition. Retrieved March 21, 2015, from http://eds(dot)a(dot)ebscohost(dot)com(dot)library(dot)gcu(dot)edu:2048/ehost/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=1bbf5130-c079-4b5f-8341-c25603c479e5@sessionmgr4003&hid=4208&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=ccm&AN=2012250220

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Pressure ulcer prevention
Student:
Professor:
Course title:
Date:
Theory identification
Despite the association of pressure ulcers with the negligence of the nursing staff, it is the duty of the healthcare service providers to offer management strategies to mitigate the effects of the same. It has become a priority of the health care providers to seek to address the pressure ulcers issue in every healthcare setting in the world over.
In order to achieve the intended goal of managing the pressure ulcers, the theory of positivism in health care provision can be adopted. It is a practical theory which is based on research to develop theories rather than articulation of theories to develop research. Positivism emphasizes on the specific body part that is affected by an ailment. The focus is well articulated in the specific area, the condition and the treatment so as to achieve maximum high quality results.
Cunningham, Nab & Bowie (2014) note that; positivism focuses on discovery of general laws about a phenomenon, the particular causes as well as the effects. The rationale for selection of this theory is because it emphasizes on facts and reality. It does not dwell on assumptions or the generalized views that may be out of chances. Positivism is based on the reality on the ground and not articulated on a particular instance.
Above all, positivism seeks to integrate social aspects in the health care so as to achieve maximum output for the patients as well as the health care providers. An efficient theory is bound to provide easiness of work to the health care providers. On the part of the patients, they are likely to acquire a quicker recovery as well as a more personalized care that leaves them feel not undermined. This follows the avoidance of generalization in the execution of the principles of this theory.
As Cunningham, Nab & Bowie (2014) found out; this theory works to support the proposed solution in the sense that, it integrates the social components in the health care. The social aspects are aligned with the particular ailment and not in a general perspective. For instance, this theory may instill integration of how different people view the pressure ulcers ailment. Different factors such as age and gender are analyzed in view of the specific ailment. Other social factors that could be considered may include social and economic classes. Different categories of people on this illness may have different views concerning this ailment. Their perspective on this particular ailment, according to the positivity theory, should then be considered in delivery of care to the specific patients.
This theory could be incorporated in to the project by integrating the social aspects. As the project is carried out, social aspects that may influence the outcomes must be considered on a diversified note. For instance, the age factor entails sampling different age groups. On the gender aspect, it means that, on the undertaking of the project, there shall be no alignment to one particular gender; rather the two genders must be given relatively equal consideration so as to come up with results that are accurate as far as positivity theory is concerned.
Review of literature
Samuriwo & Dowding. (2015, Feb...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now