Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

Modern Psychological Conceptions of Happiness and Aristotle's Classical Idea of Happiness

Essay Instructions:

Argue how modern psychological conceptions of happiness and the classical idea of happiness in Aristotle differ.

Part 1: Topic Selection

  • Due no later than 11:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday of Unit 6

  • Ungraded, but with feedback

Objectives

Upon successful completion of this assignment, students will be able to

  • discuss a variety of theories of leisure,

  • compare and contrast major philosophical perspectives on leisure both classical and modern,

  • synthesize various philosophical, psychological and economic theories of leisure,

  • defend a certain philosophical position on leisure, and

  • Generate arguments in a logical and analytic style of thinking.

Instructions

  1. Students will prepare an essay (1100 words, +/- 100 words, excluding Title and Reference pages).

  2. Choose a topic from the list below:  
  • Argue why Josef Pieper conception of leisure is the best one in modernity, or instead why it might be a limited conception in comparison to another theory of leisure.

  • Argue why a life is better with leisure today, and why for the classical Greeks, an absence of leisure meant an absence of a happy life.

  • Argue why John Dewey and modern liberal thinkers did not agree with Aristotle’s ideas on education or on leisure generally.

  • Argue how modern psychological conceptions of happiness and the classical idea of happiness in Aristotle differ.

  • What was the “Greek Leisure Ideal” and how would it manifest today according to Sebastian De Grazia? What happened to it?

  • Argue why the liberal arts are so important in education and leisure, and explain its Greek origin and how that is received today.
    • You must choose from this list, but it can be modified slightly if you have an idea you wish to pursue. The main requirement is that you must contrast at least one ancient thinker and one modern one.

    • The paper must be well researched and contain a minimum of 6 sound academic sources.

    • Textbook or course readings may be used, but do not count in this total

    • At least 3 of the new sources should be peer reviewed sources

    • The paper must be free of spelling and grammatic errors, and written and organized according to APA style.

The Iterative Parts of the Essay

There are four parts to this essay that must be followed in sequence in order for the paper to reach the final part and be graded.

Part 1: Topic Selection

  • Due no later than 11:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday of Unit 6

  • Ungraded, but with feedback

Your topic selection is Part 1 of the iterative process. Submit your topic choice, with rationale for any amendments. This part is valuable as the professor will approve any modifications you may wish to make to the topic as listed. If you choose not to modify, you can get valuable feedback by asking clarification questions about the topic question you are interested in, so take full advantage of this. See above instructions for more details.

Part 2: Outline

  • Due no later than 11:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday of Unit 7

  • Ungraded, but with feedback

Part 2 requires that you submit an outline of your essay: the argument(s) you will make and how your essay will proceed. The professor will provide critical feedback to help you in the early stages of your writing. See above instructions for more details.

Part 3: Bibliography

  • Due no later than 11:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday of Unit 8

  • Ungraded, but with feedback

Part 3 determines which texts or articles you will use to support your argument(s). You will be required to submit, on its own, a basic bibliography of at least 6 new* references you will use, with 1 or 2 sentences for each describing how it will bolster your argument(s). The professor will provide critical feedback to help you choose good sources.

* The textbook or course readings may be used as sources, but do not count in this total as new reference sources. New sources are those you must find and incorporate on your own. Further, at least 3 of the new sources should be peer reviewed sources. See above instructions for more details.

Part 4: Final Submission

  • Due no later than 11:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday of Unit 10

  • Worth 20% of final grade

This is where everything comes together, and the essay is completed. See above instructions for more details.

Evaluation

Part 4: Final Submission will be marked in its entirety out of 100. The following rubric indicates the criteria students are to adhere to, and their relative weights to the assignment overall.


Activity/Competencies Demonstrated



% of Final  Grade



Strength of Argument (40%)



 



a. Clear and coherent thesis (the main argument)



/20



b. Clear and coherent premises (reasons for accepting thesis)



/20



Mechanics (40%)



 



a. Analytical organization and structure, including Iterative parts met: outline and bibliography



/20



b. Use of new resources/proper textual support



/20



Exposition (20%)



 



a. APA Referencing and formatting /Proper Bibliography



/10



b. Spelling and grammar



/10



Total



/100


Essay Sample Content Preview:

Title
Your Name
Subject and Section
Professor's Name
Date of Submission
Since ancient times, many philosophers, theologians, and psychologists have long searched for the definition of happiness. There are several definitions that these great minds have come up with. Several approaches were utilized to come up with meanings of this ambiguous term. However, a simple definition of happiness could be the starting point to discuss what happiness is to various people.
Happiness, commonly translated in Greek word as eudaimonia, could be defined as a state of well-being which includes and encompasses living with a sense of meaning and immeasurable contentment CITATION Psy20 \l 1033 (Psychology Today, 2020). It is somewhat a subjective feeling of having a positive attitude towards something or someone that gives a person a sense of contentment and peace.
The difference between the modern psychological conceptions of happiness and Aristotle's classical idea of happiness involved the way happiness is dealt with. In the modern world, happiness is dealt with by confronting pain and trauma to understand happiness while in the classical world, by taking part in physical activities and understanding your virtues to shape and grow the mind, body, and soul CITATION Gol18 \l 1033 (Golden, 2018). To discuss further, happiness, according to Aristotle, should be defined first to compare it to "the happiness" now.
For Aristotle, happiness is the primary and ultimate purpose of life, a goal, or an end in itself. It can only be achieved at the end of one's life. It is not a temporary feeling and a fleeting moment but a long-lasting feeling. To achieve happiness, one is required to fulfil an extensive range of physical as well as mental well-being. With this, Aristotle emphasized both the connection of pleasure and complete virtue which means that to live a happy life, a person must have an excellent moral character to do the right things even in challenging scenarios. Happiness is not about seeking pleasure in life but exercising your virtues to achieve a higher goal that is immeasurable and long-lasting CITATION Pur18 \l 1033 (Pursuit of Happiness.org, 2018).
Aristotle even regarded "Friendship" as the most crucial virtue among all other virtues. Pleasure and virtue can be combined as one to obtain and complete friendship. No one in this world would choose to live without friends. However, you can never have a large number of friends because a complete, virtuous friendship requires a long-time, and it takes much work. Not anyone you come by in your whole life will you regard as someone you can have a complete, virtuous friendship with. Most importantly, having "Friendship" is crucial because it shapes our intellectual and emotional being.
Aristotle also explained happiness through the "Hierarchical View of Nature, ' which discussed four different kinds of things that exist in this world: Mineral, Vegetative, Animal, and Human. This approach showed that of all these things, humans are the only beings with capabilities to reason because we are rational beings. Even if animals could also think, they do not have all the capabilities of being rational because for them, it is all about pleasure and reproduction. However, for humans,...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to happiness essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!