Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
Harvard
Subject:
Education
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 35.64
Topic:

Choices, Values and Frames, authored by Daniel kahneman and Amos Tversky

Essay Instructions:

Free from any plagiarism
Write 5 abstracts:
Write an abstract of 300 words for the four (4) nominated readings in the Reading Material and
Exercises book (RME). The nominated readings for the current semester are listed under the
heading "Further information" see below.
1.
Write an abstract of 300 words on a single reading of your choice from a different section of the
RME to those that contain the nominated readings. That is not from the sections which the above
nominated readings have been selected.
2.
Under each of the five (5) abstracts, write a 150 word example of how each reading relates to
your work experience, or how they could relate to an imaginary work situation. If you do not have
any relevant work experience the “experience” components may be based on your personal
experience.
3.
A feature of the assignment is the requirement of strict compliance with the word limits, each
component has a word count tolerance of plus 10%.
Readings are:
Reading 2.2, Kahneman, D. and Tvesky, A. (1984), ‘Choices, values, and frames’, American
Psychologist, 39(4).
Reading 4.3, Wildavsky, A., and Dake, K. (1990), ‘Theories of risk perception: who fears what and
why?’, Daedalus, 119 (4).
Reading 6.3 Green, R.M. (1984), ‘Neutral, Omnipartial rule-making, in Green, R.M., The Ethical
Manager, Macmillan.
Reading 7.3 Janis, I.L. (1971), ‘Groupthink’, Psychology Today, November.
The 5th Abstract must be completed for a reading of your choice taken from one of Section 1, 3, 5 or 8 of the Reading Material and Exercises book.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Abstracts
Name:
Instructor:
Course:
Date:

Choices, Values and Frames, authored by Daniel kahneman and Amos Tversky
In the research paper titled Choices, Values and Frames, authored by Daniel kahneman and Amos Tversky; offers some insightful information on the aspect of making choices and the psychological determinants related to risks of the choices and the consequences perceived.According to the paper, risky choices are made without the knowledge of the consequences that come from making the choice. Reason being that, most of the consequences that relate to the risky choices is determined by unforeseen circumstances. If one makes the choice to go to war with the enemy, there are a lot factors that are unseen and could relate to the perceptions and the objectives of the enemy including their resolve. Gambling with a choice means one has evaluated the gains and the losses that are aligned with probability quotients. In light decisions that are coupled with sure expectations, most people tend to go with these while averting to risk involved with a gamble that has almost the same gains. In reference to a research paper written by Daniel Bernoulli, the tendencies for people to avoid risks decreases with increasing wealth.The outcomes of a choice largely determine the choices that people make contrary to monetary outcomes of their decisions. According to Bernoulli, the subjective values perceived in the risks is a concave functions that relies on the money element. However the psychophysical measurements show that the subjective value is actually a function of the size of the gains which assumes a concave shape. According to the article, when the functions values relative to gains and the losses are perceived together, they form an s-shaped function.Gains are more attractive than the losses and therefore the differences in the steepness of the curves. The losses tend to be steeper while the gains are not relative to aversive elements of making the choices related to the two possible outcomes. The status quo determines the positivity or the negativity of the outcomes of a given choice.
Application of the research
In an example at the workplace most of the choices are framed with the values and the losses that are expected. When making a choice regarding my future at the company, are also informed by the status quo. At the moment the company is offering a comfortable position that has a decent pay and favorable working and limited pressure. This aspects and conditions of the current company and the position alongside the benefits accruing to the position form the status quo that I relate with. When offered another position at a different company, where I may get better pay, less flexible hours and higher pressure but with added benefits such fully sponsored vacations, it may be tempting, but the values attached to the new positions are too risky. At the moment, the current company is relatively small but it is making continuous progress and at the same time I have formed solid relationships with the management and my colleagues. At the same time there higher chances that if the company expands I may take up more responsibilities thereby driving my career forwards.
At the new company, there are leaning curves to...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to values:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!