Twelve Angry Men Essay

English 103 Prompt from the Instructor: Watch the 1957 Film "12 Angry Men"... it's available on Youtube: http://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=mzPll63y2b0 In a double-spaced, thesis-driven essay of at least five typed pages, respond to only one of the following two choices: Choice 1: Argue what you think is the most relevant fallacy in the film: be sure and explain why. Because you are arguing that this is the most most relevant fallacy (fallacy is defined: fault in logic or reasoning) in the 12 Angry Men Film. Don't just identify the most relevant fallacy but show how this most relevant fallacy influences the discussions and the juror or juror who use it. Consider the jurors who share a faith this most relevant fallacy, as well as those who share a lack of faith in it. What does each juror say? How does each juror act and or react? Some jurors may even have a hidden motive behind their feelings on the matter. Be aware of how the fallacy is presented, how others characters respond to the fallacy, and how the direction of the plot is changed (or not changed) based on this fallacy. Remember, you are analyzing a fallacy, which means one, so stay focused on only one fallacy in the film. Choice 2: How does Davis (Juror #8) establish and maintain his argument? Consider how Davis presents himself in contrast to the others; consider a particular quality or trait he has that enables him to accomplish the unanimous "not guilty" verdict. Look at how he brings others to his side of the argument, how he rebuts or debates issues with those who disagree with him, and how even deals with the characters of other men and their real motivations behind their initial decision. What does he say and or do? What do the other men say or do in response? Be aware of how Davis presents his argument, how he sustains it, and how he manages to bring others to his point of view. Format Guidelines for your essay: At least 5 Pages minimum, Double Spaced, Times New Roman Font, 1 inch margins all Notes from me the Student: After watching the film I took the following notes on each of the 12 jurors. Juror 1). He is an assistant coach. Tries to establish an order on how to proceed on jury deliberations. Juror 2). He is shy, quiet because it's his first time in a jury. He works at a Bank. Juror 3). He is angry, emotional and sentimental. Has a strain relationship with his son who he hasn't seen in 2 years since they fought. He allows his emotional to get the best of him at many parts of the film. Juror 4). He is intelligent and educated. He is the juror who wears glasses that leave a mark on his nose. He is the only juror who doesn't sweat. His job is a broker. Juror 5). This juror could relate to the young defendant on trial because he grew up in a similar background in the poor slums. Juror 6). His occupation is a painter. Defends and stands up Juror 9 with respect when others jurors try to bully Juror 9 because he is the oldest juror in the room. Juror 7). He is selfish. He is eager to finish the jury deliberation as soon as possible so he can watch a baseball game. Constantly makes jokes. Juror 8). His name is Davis. He is an architect. He is the 1st juror to vote not guilty. Davis's behavior is that he likes to put things in order. He is impartial, calm, sympathetic, and responsible. Davis looks at all angles before making a decision. Davis takes the case very seriously and is very considerate of others and overall very respectful. Davis takes time to discuss the case like for example. The evidence of the knife. He discusses the testimony of the old man who murder. Davis demonstartes the time limit of the old man walking to the door and also questions the woman who supposedly saw the defendant commit the murder. Davis also looks at the circumstances of the boys alibi and the noise factor of the train. Juror 9). His name is McCardle. The oldest juror in the room. He is wise and is the first person to change his vote from guilty to not guilty. McCardle is the person who brought up the issue of the eye glasses that leave a mark on Juror 4 nose which questions the testimony of the woman who supposedly saw the defendant commit the murder which causes reasonable doubt. Juror 10). He is racist. Goes on a racist rant not relevant to the case. He is the juror who tends to wipe his nose frequently with a wipe because he has a summer cold. Juror 11). His occupation is a watchmaker. He is polite. Has an accent because he was an immigrant. Confronts Juror 7 when Juror 7 changes his vote from guilty for not guilty without actual reasoning. Juror 12). His occupation is an advertisement executive. Tends to flip flop between deciding on guilty, not guilty, guilty and finally not guilty.