Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 5.18
Topic:

Kant and Ross’ Nonconsequentialism Essay

Research Paper Instructions:

Both Philosophers Emmanuel Kant and William David Ross are nonconsequentialists, yet they disagree about the role of consequences in determining the morally right act. Compare and contrast their views regarding the role of consequences. Which view is preferable? Why?
I have provided you with class materials for you to use. Feel free to do your own research. Thanks

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:

Your Name
Subject and Section
Professor’s Name
Date of Submission
Kant and Ross’ Nonconsequentialism
Nonconsequentialism supports the idea that a morally right act does not necessarily determined by the moral goodness of the consequences alone. Many philosophers who share the same view of being nonconsequentialists doesn’t have the same interpretation of the moral rightness of an act. Some argues that consequences is not the only factor to be considered when identifying if an action is morally right or wrong while others have contrasting views.
Both Emmanuel Kant and David William Ross are nonconsequentialists but have contrasting views on moral rightness of an act and its relation to consequences. Ross, like most nonconsequentialists, believe that consequences alone does not completely determine the moral rightness of an action. However, consequences matter and is con...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Research Paper Samples: