Modern Bureaucracy and the Segmentation of the Working Class
SOC 5 Global Social Change (2021 mid-term test)
The completed test is due on Canvas on Nov 1 (Monday) at 11:59 pm. Give clear and articulate answers. Limit your number of quotes to three per question. No long (more than six word) quotes.
No word limit. In my opinion, seven hundred words are sufficient for Q.1, and five hundred words are sufficient for each of the other questions.
You can form study teams with classmates. Do not ask the graduate student instructors for answers.
There is ample time to complete the test. No deadline extension without proper documentation.
Answer Q.1
1. How does modern bureaucracy promote as well as denigrate social fairness, justice, and equality? Use examples NOT directly from my lectures to illustrate what you mean (50 percent)
Answer two of the following three questions.
2. Discuss the functions and consequences of segmentation in relation to the working class.
Do online research and give a present-day (21st century) example of such segmentation.
Remember to cite the sources (25 percent).
3. Why is a nation “an imagined political community”? What were the dynamics behind the rise of the nation-state? (25 percent)
4. How do the transnational capitalist class and the transnational state differ from the conventional capitalist class and the conventional state? What were the reasons behind the rise of the transnational capitalist class and the transnational state? (25 percent)
Global Social Change
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Name
Professor’ Name
Date
Question 1: Modern Bureaucracy and the Concepts of Social Fairness, Justice and Equality
There are several ways in which modern bureaucracy promotes as well as denigrates the concepts of social fairness, justice, and equality. Let us start with the concept of social fairness. Social fairness is often described as the perception of the extent to which an activity or action is right or fair. The perceptions about how right or fair an action is may differ from community to community. Nevertheless, when discussing the concept of social fairness, it is safe to go with those concepts that are generally agreed upon by most members of the society. Having observed that, the following is a discussion of how modern bureaucracy promotes social fairness. First, modern bureaucracies are characterized by impersonal relationships (Mouzelis, 2017). As a consequence, every person in the bureaucratic organization is exposed to the same set of rules or procedures. This impersonal nature ensures social fairness since no person is treated more or less fairly than the other. Here is an example. Suppose the rules of a bureaucratic organization states that every person should report to their jobs by 8 am and outline the consequences for not adhering to those regulations. Such a rule would have the same consequences to all the employees without discrimination. Modern bureaucracy may also denigrate social fairness. The most common way in which modern bureaucracies denigrate social fairness is through being slow to respond to issues relating to social fairness. Here is an example. Suppose an employee complains to the management about a colleague who has sexual harassment traits. While such a matter generally needs to be marked as urgent, it may take plenty of time before it is addressed by a bureaucratic organization. The end result is that social fairness is denigrated.
Justice refers to the legal/ philosophical instruments through which fairness is administered. The famous adage that justice delayed is justice denied can never be truer. Modern bureaucracy has both promoted and denigrated the concept of justice. Due to the complex nature of modern organizations and the evolvement of cultures, most modern bureaucracies have introduced a department of justice in their organizations (Mixon, 2019). These departments ensure that there is a working professional code of ethics that should be followed by every professional. They also provide for the rights and privileges of various stakeholders and the consequences of any party that denies or withholds those rights. Through such mechanisms, justice is promoted. Here is an example. In healthcare organizations, nurses are guided by a professional code of conduct. If a nurse causes harm to a patient by a failure of observing the ethical principles, that nurses face appropriate consequences such as revoking of their licenses. The patient on the other hand receives appropriate compensation. Modern bureaucracy also denigrates justice. The most common way through which this phenomenon occurs is through delays. An example is the justice system. The justice system has been accused of taking too long t...
π Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Term Paper Samples:
- The Epic Story of Sundiata: Oral Tradition, Fate, Praise, and Blame5 pages/β1375 words | 5 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Term Paper |
- Arguments for and against Government Regulation of the Economy6 pages/β1650 words | 9 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Term Paper |
- Sociology of Self. Social Sciences. The Sociology of Self6 pages/β1650 words | APA | Social Sciences | Term Paper |
- Leadership and Supervision in Social Work 10 pages/β2750 words | 10 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Term Paper |
- Impacts of Industrial Revolution in Structure and Culture of American Workplace11 pages/β3025 words | 5 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Term Paper |
- Final Technology and Innovation: A case study of Nokia23 pages/β6325 words | APA | Social Sciences | Term Paper |
- United States verses Nevada Constitution8 pages/β2200 words | 4 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Term Paper |