Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Communications & Media
Type:
Annotated Bibliography
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 11.88
Topic:

Annotated Bibliography Communications & Media Annotated Bibliography

Annotated Bibliography Instructions:

Outline and further information
You are required to produce an annotated bibliography of three academic texts, one text will be assigned by the tutor, and the other two will be sourced by you. It will be 250 words per annotation (750 words total), +-10%). An annotated bibliography involves summarising and making a critical evaluation of scholarly texts.
I've given you three readings


 


Annotated Bilbliography



Annotated Bilbliography

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeRelevance, quality, reliability and currency of texts

25.0 Pts


Weighting criteria


Not available to choose

23.06 Pts


HD


Texts chosen are highly relevant to the topic/subject and add greatly to assignment potential. All texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject. All texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

19.87 Pts


D


All texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject.All texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

17.37 Pts


C


All texts are interesting and clearly related to topic/subject. Most texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject.Most texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

14.25 Pts


P


Most texts cover topic/subject, but they are less interesting and the relationship to topic/subject is less clear. Most texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject. Most texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

11.75 Pts


F3


Texts are uninspiring and relationship to topic/subject is unclear. Few texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject. Few texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

9.25 Pts


F2


Few texts are relevant to the topic/subject; may require significant additional research. No texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject. No texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

3.69 Pts


F1


Texts are not relevant to researcher’s topic; texts necessitate extensive additional research. No texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject. No reliable and/or trustworthy texts cited.

0.0 Pts


F0


No supporting evidence.


25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDepth of comprehension and critical analysis

25.0 Pts


Criteria weighting


Not available to choose

23.06 Pts


HD


Annotations reflect a deep critical, analytical understanding of texts in the detailed & thoughtful evaluation of each one.

19.87 Pts


D


Annotations generally reflect a critical, analytical understanding of the texts but is uneven. Some detailed evaluation however there is a lack of interrogation of the texts.

17.37 Pts


C


Annotations demonstrate basic comprehension of texts but not a critical, analytical understanding of it. Some evaluation however few comments are ‘quotes’ or paraphrases rather than evaluation of each text.

14.25 Pts


P


Annotations demonstrate some awareness of text details but not a critical, analytical understanding of texts; points made are vague and unsubstantiated. Few descriptive ‘quotes’ or paraphrases.

11.75 Pts


F3


Annotations demonstrate limited awareness of text details and no critical, analytical understanding of texts. Some descriptive ‘quotes’ or paraphrases.

9.25 Pts


F2


Very limited evaluative comment included and no awareness of text detail. Most descriptive ‘quotes’ or paraphrases.

3.69 Pts


F1


No evaluative comment included and no awareness of text detail. Annotations are a collection of ‘quotes’ or paraphrases.

0.0 Pts


F0


No supporting evidence.


25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeElements of annotated bibliography

20.0 Pts


Criteria weighting


Not available to choose

18.45 Pts


HD


All elements of the annotations are present & there is an accurate detailed descriptions of each text in a clear & consistent, succinct manner.

15.9 Pts


D


All elements of the annotations are present & accurately recorded in succinct detail highlighting the key points in each text.

13.9 Pts


C


Key elements of the annotations are present & accurate, but may lack some detail.

11.4 Pts


P


Key elements of the annotations are present & mainly accurate.

9.4 Pts


F3


1 or 2 key elements of the annotations are missing and other elements lack some detail.

7.4 Pts


F2


3 or more key elements of the annotations are missing and other elements are mainly inaccurate.

2.95 Pts


F1


All key elements of the annotations are missing and other elements are inaccurate. Submission does not classify as an annotation.

0.0 Pts


F0


No supporting evidence.


20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeClarity and fluency of written expression

15.0 Pts


Criteria weighting


Not available to choose

13.84 Pts


HD


Writing demonstrates exceptionally strong control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Minor need for editing.

11.92 Pts


D


Writing demonstrates strong control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Minor need for editing.

10.42 Pts


C


Writing demonstrates control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Some need for editing.

8.55 Pts


P


Writing demonstrates control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Considerate need for editing.

7.05 Pts


F3


Writing demonstrates limited control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Substantial need for editing.

5.55 Pts


F2


Numerous errors in usage, spelling, capitalisation, and punctuation make the text difficult to read. Severity and frequency of errors make it difficult to focus on the message and must reread for meaning. Need for extensive editing.

2.21 Pts


F1


Extensive errors in usage, spelling, capitalisation, and punctuation make the text extremely difficult to read. Reader cannot understand the message due to severity and frequency of errors. Need for re-writing.

0.0 Pts


F0


No supporting evidence.


15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAccuracy of bibliographic citation in APA style

15.0 Pts


Criteria weighting


Not available to choose

13.84 Pts


HD


Complete citation with ALL elements of APA style in the correct format and order.

11.92 Pts


D


Complete citation with ALL elements of APA style, most in the correct format and order.

10.42 Pts


C


Complete citation with ALL elements of APA style, few in the correct format and order.

8.55 Pts


P


Contains all KEY elements of APA style in the correct format and order.

7.05 Pts


F3


Contains most KEY elements of APA style, few in the correct format and order.

5.55 Pts


F2


Contains SOME elements of APA style, most in the correct format and order.

2.21 Pts


F1


Contains FEW elements of APA style, few in the correct format and order.

0.0 Pts


F0


No supporting evidence.


15.0 pts

Total points: 100.0


 


 


CDIC001 - Digital Communities


Assessment Task 2 Brief - Annotated Bibliography


 


Aim of task 2


For you to identify key theoretical approaches to digitally mediates groups, critically discuss relevant concepts and produce evaluative summaries of scholarly texts.


 



ASSESSMENT TASK 2

WEIGHT

OUTCOMES



DUE

Annotated Bibliography  

20%

a and d



Online Submission via Canvas, Week 4 Friday 23:59 

Outline and further information


You are required to produce an annotated bibliography of three academic texts, one text will be assigned by the tutor, and the other two will be sourced by you.  It will be 250 words per annotation (750 words total), +-10%). An annotated bibliography involves summarising and making a critical evaluation of scholarly texts.


 



 

CRITERIA

WEIGHT

SLOs

PLOs

1

Relevance, quality, reliability and currency of texts 

25%

a

A1

2

Depth of comprehension and critical analysis 

25%

a

A1 B2

3

Elements of annotated bibliography:


Full bibliographic citation


Introduction


Identifies the aim and/or main argument of text


Points out in in what way the reading relates to themes or concepts in subject


States strengths and/or limitations of the text (critical analysis)


Identifies any conclusions made by the author

20%

a

A1 B2

4

Clarity and fluency of written expression

15%

d

C1 E1

5

Accuracy of bibliographic citation/reference in APA Style

15%

d

E1


 


 


 


 


MORE INFORMATION


 


What is the assigned text? Where can I find it?


The assigned text is: Baym, Nancy 2010, 'Communities and Networks (Chapter 4)' in Personal Connections in the Digital Age, Cambridge, Polity Press, pp.106-139. Via  2-hour loan in Library Open Reserve or https://www.lib.uts.edu.au/drr/43249/


 


Where can I find other texts to write my annotated bibliography?


http://www.lib.uts.edu.au


https://scholar.google.com.au


 


How do I avoid plagiarism?


https://avoidingplagiarism.uts.edu.au


 


Academic misconduct and dishonesty will not be tolerated and penalties will apply.


 


Can I add more than three texts to the annotated bibliography?


NO. You are required to write an annotated bibliography of three text, no more, no less.


Annotated Bibliography Sample Content Preview:

Annotated Bibliography
Name
Institution
Course
Date
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Brunswicker, S., Matei, S. A., Zentner, M., Zentner, L., & Klimeck, G. (2017). Creating impact in the digital space: digital practice dependency in communities of digital scientific innovations. Scientometrics, 110(1), 417-442.
In this article, the authors have presented an argument on the importance of digital space. According to this article, modern science has become digital. The internet has had a lot of benefits because it has supported the development of digital performs and programs that can be able to connect people globally. The authors assert that it is very important for individuals to understand the significance of digital technologies. This article has provided comprehensive research on the importance of digital technologies. According to Brunswicker, Matei, Zentner, Zentner & Klimeck (2017), scientists can develop digital platforms that can establish collaborative relationships outside the traditional realm. The authors have given an example of a well-known platform nanoHUB which has more than 300,000 users who have been registered. This is a platform that gives gamers a better way of creating interactive scientific applications via the API. In this article, there is a research question that has guided the authors throughout the research. This research question is; to what extent is a programmer’s scientific impact dependent upon the digital community-level work structure, the digital practice structure? This question is very important because it has assisted the authors to ascertain how scientific programmers have an impact on the digital community. Various concepts like digital practice structure have been introduced in the article. This article is important because it has offered insights into the impact of digital space on the online community. Additionally, the authors have also highlighted that more research is very important to understand the complete impact of digital space. However, this article is not conclusive enough to form a majority of one's understanding of online communities.
Ormerod, P. (1999). Digital communities of interest. Business information review, 16(3), 137-142.
In this article, Ormerod has discussed the significance of online communities when it comes to different professions. Additionally, the author has identified different ways of establishing different online communities and how these communities can be cultivated. Th...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Annotated Bibliography Samples: