Week 9 Response: The Escalating Sexual Characteristics

Week 9 Response
Name:
Title of the Course:
Instructor’s Name:
Date:
Week 9 Response
First and foremost all the three articles are focused on the escalating sexual characteristics, pieces of stuff that raise a lot of concerns in society. For instance, Lauren Berlant and Michael Warner exposes sexual practices in society and the concept of queer politics surrounding these traits. G.I. bill Margot Canaday tackles the same topic sexuality, but she focuses on social citizenship to express her feelings about the sensual subject. On the other, Judith Halberstam’s study is focused on the idea homosexuality. Judith uses the notion queer temporality and postmodern geographies to express her feelings about the topic. Henceforth, below is reaction response to the work of the three scholars. In the study, I highlight concepts that I back, those that I dislike and those that are thought-provoking.
Sex in Public
The paper is dedicated to unfolding the fundamental objectives of queer culture building: not only sexual characteristics but transformed likelihood character, culture, publics, lucidity and unique sex relationship which appear when heterosexual pairs are no longer the favorite. I support the notion of heterosexuality as brought out in the study. For instance, the study views heterosexuality as a unified set of shared beliefs, not a single thought.1 Also, I back its view on queer culture which is depicted as a world-marking venture including more individuals than one can think of, spaces that one cannot map and traits that can only be experienced not learned.1 However, I disregard the authors’ view of tweaking and thwacking, especially the perception that sex is present everywhere because sex is a trait that can be controlled or eliminated.1 In fact, it is described as an involuntary response. In spite of this impediment, the overall ...