Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
7 pages/≈1925 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 25.2
Topic:

Capital Punishment

Essay Instructions:

This is the final draft of a previously submitted paper. It must be 1925 word you must use the instructions. I have provided the first draft with prof notes.
This final writing assignment allows you to present an analysis of the best reasoning on each side of your issue. In the process, you will get to demonstrate some of the key skills you have learned during this course. In particular, you will demonstrate the ability to create high-quality arguments on both sides of an issue, to support your reasoning with scholarly sources, and to provide a fair analysis of the strength of the reasoning on each side. Use the same topic as you did on your previous papers and make sure to incorporate any relevant feedback you got from the instructor on your previous writing assignments. For an example of how to complete this paper, take a look at the Week 5 Example paper (in the classroom).
Your paper must include the following sections, clearly labeled:
Introduction
Introduce readers to your topic; include a brief preview of what you will accomplish in this paper. (approximately 150 words)
First Argument
Present the best argument on one side of the issue. (approximately 150 words)
Express your argument in standard form, with the premises listed one by one above the conclusion.
Defense for First Argument
Support the first argument as well as you can, using academic sources to demonstrate the truth of key premises. You may also choose to clarify the meaning of key premises and to explain how your reasoning supports the conclusion (approximately 250 words).
Opposing Argument
Present the best argument on the other side of the issue (approximately 150 words).
Express your argument in standard form.
Defense of Opposing Argument
Support the opposing argument as well as you can, using academic sources to demonstrate the truth of key premises. You are welcome as well to clarify the meaning of premises and/or to explain the reasoning further (approximately 250 words).
Analysis of the Reasoning (approximately 350 words)
Evaluate the quality of each argument, addressing whether key premises are true and whether the conclusion logically follows from them.
Analyze arguments for any fallacies committed or for any biases that may influence either side. Do you feel that one argument makes a much stronger case than the other and why? (There is no need to “take sides,” only to assess the quality of the arguments.)
Support your analysis with scholarly sources.
Conclusion (approximately 150 words)
Provide a brief conclusion and summary of your issue and how it can best be addressed by critical thinkers.
The Analyzing Reasoning on Both Sides Final Paper
Must be 1,200 to 1,600 words in length (not including title and references pages), double-spaced, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).
Must use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text. The Help! Need Article (Links to an external site.)tutorial can also assist with searching for
The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view this Ashford University Library Quick ‘n’ Dirty (Links to an external site.) tutorial, which introduces the Ashford University Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper guide. (Links to an external site.)
Must include a separate references pages that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Capital Punishment
Name
Affiliation
Course
Tutor
Capital Punishment
Introduction
Capital punishment has raised arguments among different individuals and even groups of people towards determination on the appropriateness of the law. While some people think and claim it is right for serious crimes such as murder, others believe it is morally wrong and should never be imposed on any offender. The people supporting the law argue that the victims should get the desired justice. Also, they believe that murderers should be eliminated from society. On the other hand, the population opposing the death penalty state that it does not benefit humanity since it leads to another murder case and a belief that the action is appropriate to the community. Hence, there are different arguments on the death penalty across the world, with some people and communities supporting while others oppose the bill.
The death penalty is appropriate.
The death penalty is appropriate. The approval of capital punishment is entirely dependent on the crime in question. What argument would a judge give for setting someone who committed murder free? What about the lives of the murdered individuals? Looking into the debate shows that the appropriateness of capital punishment to someone who has imposed death on another person or group of people is appropriate, and justice should take the implementation under legal obligations (BBC, 2020). For instance, the torturing and murder of Genny Rojas by Veronica and Ivan shows that the offenders did not deserve any lesser punishment than the death penalty (Stimson, 2019). “They suspended her alive by a hook on the closet wall in their apartment. They shook her violently, strangled her, beat her with a hairbrush, and handcuffed her for days. She died after she was forced into a scalding bathtub for three minutes” (Stimson, 2019). Stimson (2019) states that the action led to Veronica and Ivan's death sentence, and anyone would agree that they deserved the punishment. No other ruling could serve justice to the trauma and painful death experienced by Rojas, and anyone participating in the debate would agree with the California Jury on the sentence.
The election and administration of Donald Trump strengthened capital punishment on severe and specific federal offenses. Although most people in the United States think the president is wrong in advocating for the rule, his stance proves he has genuine intentions in protecting the people he is leading. First, his support on capital punishment is conditioned to taking effect only on appropriate situations (Broughton, 2017). This statement reveals that any offender sentenced to death will have committed a crime that deserves the punishment. Second, Trump has appointed high-level prosecutors who cannot support the abolition of the law to take charge of the death penalty (Broughton, 2017). The appointed judges, such as Neil Gorsuch, are well equipped with the constitution, and they would not do anything to detriment the law, meaning the jurisdiction is profoundly justified. A report by BBC (2020) claims that anyone committing murder has given up on human rights, with their lives in line, and should be punished through death. Also, significant populations acr...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to death penalty: