Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
6 pages/β‰ˆ1650 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 25.92
Topic:

Macondo Well Individual Assignment 2 Final

Case Study Instructions:

Individual Assignment 2 Final (Case Study Final)
Macondo Well Case Report
How this will be graded:
Structure, Organization, Ease of reading, Grammar: 3 Points
This Assignment had a very, very specific structure. Identify 2-4 issues. Come up with solutions for those issues and summarize them briefly. Provide a table with Pros and Cons for each, and wrap it all up with an overall (but brief) recommendation – what could have been done to help prevent this disaster from a PM perspective. DID YOU FOLLOW THIS STRUCTURE?
Did you follow the advice given in the lectures and From Your Instructor about the format?
Did you follow rules of English grammar, spelling, and syntax? Did you fix errors pointed out via Word’s editing capabilities (e.g. squiggly blue or red underlined text)?
Content: 9 Points
Is it clear from reading your assignment that you read the case and understood what happened that led up to the Deepwater Horizon explosion?
Did you ‘dig deeper’? Some people identify very technical issues – did you find the underlying reasoning that may have driven decisions to go a certain way technically?
Did you keep your writing concise and to the point? Part of the intent of this assignment is an exercise in expressing important ideas in as efficient a way as possible.
Was there a logical flow from your Issue Identification to your Proposed Solutions, to your Pros and Cons and to your conclusion?
If you did have ‘extra’ information to exhibit, did you put it in an Appendix rather than in the body of the text? Again, the focus is on a concise, crisp presentation of your arguments.

References and resources: 2 Points
Did you provide several relevant references that helped make your points? Of course you can use the main MIT/Sloan case as a reference, but did you reach out and find out more about the Deepwater Horizon from other sources?

Other things to consider:
Did you add value from your own professional and/or personal experience?
Did you make appropriate use of figures and tables in an appendix? Don't substitute quantity for quality here - one good, relevant, and meaningful small table is worth 100 randomly inserted graphs and charts.
Did you really take on the viewpoint of a project leader here, and consider the way the team was motivated, the way the different stakeholders communicated (or didn’t), the culture of the different companies?
use https://www(dot)pmi(dot)org/learning/library/comparison-risk-events-with-risk-management-9919
and the pdf of deepwater as the resources to cite.

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Macondo Well Case Report
Name:
Instructor:
Course:
Date:
Macondo Well Case Report
Introduction
On the 20th day of April 2010, the US experienced one of the worst disasters of all times. The oil rig, otherwise known as the Deepwater Horizon – located at the Macondo well exploded. The Macondo well explosion leaked millions of barrels of oil. The explosion traveled over 42 miles off the Louisiana coast. Consequently, the leaked oil found its way into the Gulf of Mexico. At the same time, the Deepwater Horizon left eleven of the crew members who were on board dead. Going by the Ocean Portal Team report, at the time the well was capped, that is the 15th of July 2010, that is, precisely 87 days before the explosion, an approximation of about 3.19 millions of barrels of oil had leaked into the Gulf ocean (Ingersoll, C., Locke, R. M., & Reavis, C., 2012).
Technical Issues
The Macondo well was intended to be an exploratory well. It was drilled to establish the availability of the extractable hydrocarbons. Besides Macondo well was drilled to examine the associated reservoir structures. Initially, the plan on the Macondo well drill was meant to be of a depth of 1960 feet. However, in early April 2010, the decision to continue drilling was stopped when the process of drilling the well had reached a total depth of about 18360. Instead, the decision was made to cease the drilling for a short-term period. The idea behind the drilling cessation was to abandon the well for some time and later use it for the production of both gas and oil. Going by the BP’s accident investigation findings, about four hydrocarbon zones had been detected. The hydrocarbon zones existed at depths ranging between 17,788 and 18,223 feet. Besides, the distinctions between the highest reservo...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples: