Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.58
Topic:

The Oakdale Administrator

Case Study Instructions:

OVERVIEW
You are required to write a critique on two case studies in this course as outlined in your required reading. Your critique should discuss the major facts of the case and should tell whether you believe the right decision(s) was/were made and why. Doing so not only further develops and demonstrates strong critical thinking skills, but also broadens your awareness and understanding of issues facing today’s public administrators.
INSTRUCTIONS
The format of each case study critique should be as follows:
 Identify the important facts in the case study.
 What decision(s) were made in the case study.
 Do you believe the decisions were appropriate?
 Discuss any alternative solution(s) to the problem and support those solutions with
additional research (with similar cases).
 Conclusion
 References.
 Make sure each section is labeled appropriately (Facts, Decision, Solution, Conclusion)
 Length of assignment: 3-4 pages
 Format of assignment: APA 7.
 Number of citations: 4, to include the case study itself.
 Acceptable sources include scholarly articles published within the last five years
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Title
Your Name
Subject and Section
Professor’s Name
Date
The Oakdale Administrator Case
This case revolves around the challenges faced by Oakdale, a suburban municipality seeking to revitalize its economy and infrastructure. A controversial redevelopment project led by City Administrator Angela Donny, coupled with fiscal mismanagement, resulted in Mayor Hoffnagel's resignation. City Administrator Paul Asher faces the critical decision of continuing the troubled redevelopment project, with implications for Oakdale's finances and public trust, highlighting the ethical complexities in public administration and the role of leadership (Cropf et al., 2012).
Facts
The Oakdale Administration case delves into the intricate challenges encountered by the suburban municipality of Oakdale in its quest for economic revitalization and the rejuvenation of its deteriorating infrastructure. With a population of approximately 5,000, Oakdale has long grappled with economic stagnation and the decline of its urban facilities, resulting in a lackluster reputation compared to its neighboring municipalities. Upon assuming office, Mayor Hoffnagel advocated for an ambitious redevelopment project to solve the city's economic woes. However, the controversial appointment of City Administrator Angela Donny, who possessed a contentious track record and had previously faced scrutiny from the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), initiated a complex phase. Donny's management of the redevelopment initiative, marked by procedural irregularities and financial mismanagement, exacerbated the crisis, leading to mounting debt and public outcry. Ultimately, this turmoil culminated in Mayor Hoffnagel's resignation, ushering in a change in the city's administrative leadership, with interim Mayor Marie Clarkson and City Administrator Paul Asher tasked with the formidable decision of whether to persist with the beleaguered redevelopment project or mitigate financial losses (Cropf et al., 2012).
This intricate situation underscores a pivotal juncture in Oakdale's trajectory, where decision-makers must meticulously evaluate the economic merits of the redevelopment project in light of its fiscal risks. Asher is responsible for reaching a decision that impacts the city's financial health and reverberates throughout its reputation and the trust of its residents. The case underscores the ethical dimensions inherent in public administration and the critical role of leadership in navigating a complex and challenging predicament (Cropf et al., 2012).
Decision
The central dilemma pertains to the future of the beleaguered redevelopment project, a brainchild of Mayor Hoffnagel and under the administration of City Administrator Angela Donny. The crux lies in deciding between advancing with the embattled redevelopment initiative or its termination. This momentous decision is fraught with far-reaching consequences encompassing the city's fiscal health, its standing in the public eye, and the bedrock of trust among its inhabitants. City Administrator Paul Asher, the linchpin in this decision-making process, is tasked with a delicate calculus, necessitating a meticulous assessment of the latent economic merits vis-à-vis fiscal haza...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!