Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.5
Topic:

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Section G: Evaluation of Process

Research Paper Instructions:

In 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page), develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:
Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data.
Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.
Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.
Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.
Describe implications for practice and future research.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine "Section G: Evaluation" for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Section G: Evaluation of Process

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00%
3
Satisfactory
88.00%
4
Good
92.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Evaluation

100.0 %Develop an evaluation plan. Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data, the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives were achieved, and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability. Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results and the implications for practice and future research.
Evaluation plan presents the method used in the measurement of the outcomes but does not align the project objectives and/or evidence. The rationale is missing. Modification strategies as well as the impact to future research may or may not be present with minimal details. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Evaluation plan presents the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and/or evidence. The rationale is missing. The information presented is ambiguous. Modification strategies as well as the impact to future research may or may not be present with minimal details. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Evaluation plan presents the rationale for and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. The information presented may lack cohesiveness and details. Possible project modifications when outcomes do not provide expected results are listed. The implications for practice and future research are broadly described. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Evaluation plan presents the rationale for and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. Validity, reliability, and applicability are briefly addressed. Strategies for project modification when outcomes do not provide expected results are outlined. Implications for practice and future research are broadly described. Integrative and accurate comprehension is demonstrated and information is applied as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
Evaluation plan presents the rationale and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. The information presented is aligned, comprehensive, and addresses validity, reliability, and applicability. The plan formulates clear and precise strategies for project modification when outcomes do not provide expected results. An informed position on the implications for practice and future research is developed and explained. Clarity and specificity of comprehension is demonstrated and all relevant information is synthesized. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
100 %Total Weightage

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE PROPOSAL: SECTION G: EVALUATION OF PROCESS
Your Name
Course No.
Professor
UNIVERSITY
SECTION G: EVALUATION OF PROCESS
Rationale for Selection of Outcome Data Collection Methods
The process evaluation framework will be underpinned bythe precepts proposed by Steckler and Linnan (Waqa et al., 2013). Firstly, the intervention, specifications and expected outcomes will be clearly defined. Program outcome data will then be collected using a baseline survey that will be conducted on the target population. The survey will focus on the evaluation of whether the intervention implementation time plans, budgets and program objectives are working as was envisaged (Hughey et al., 2014). Process evaluation will be achieved through collection, assessment and interpretation of survey data. The primary data collection instrument will be semi-structured questionnaire. However, to increase data reliability and validity, both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods will be used. The data collection methods will include structured observations, questionnaires, semi-structured interviews and focus groups (Celik et al., 2012). The rationale for choosing quantitative methods is due to ease of data analysis and presentation. Still, quantitative data collection methods and analysis enable rapid interrogation of data and usually yieldssummative reports.Furthermore, interpretation of quantitative findings is uncomplicated.
The rationale for using qualitative methods is to bridge the operational gap left by quantitative techniques since they practically do not address the how and why questions of program implementation (Moodie et al., 2013). The second rationale is that qualitative techniques have the potential to probeunintended information from the sampled population. Furthermore, qualitative methods are best suited for interrogating the implementation process since they can capture the divergent perspectives of multi-stakeholders participating in the intervention. In a nutshell, the rationale for using a mixed approach is that it provides a wide range of intervention outcome evaluation tools, hence comprehensive data, interpretation and analysis (Iachiri et al., 2014).
The Degree/Extend of Outcome Measurement
The survey outcome measures the extent to which the project objectives will have been achieved. Firstly, the outcome provides clarity and a holistic view of the study population. Secondly, it will be helpful in the determination of the extent to which the target audience is being impacted by the intervention (Moodie et al., 2013). Furthermore, the survey data will serve as a critical impact assessment tool for evaluating how different intervention components are meeting their intended objectives. Thirdly, the survey data will provide a basis for establishing program shortfalls as well as recommendations for future improvement (Hughey et al., 2014). The survey will target the subjects and as such the data collected will be an actual representation of the program progress from the subject’s perspective. The outcome will measure to what extent the intervention is aligned with the cultural, developmental as well as gender aspects of the study population (Celik et al., 2012). Still, the pr...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Research Paper Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now