Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 25.92
Topic:

Situational Analysis and Strategic Actions for Ford

Case Study Instructions:

the only source you need is the case
Purpose
The individual written case analysis exercise is meant to assess:
1. Your critical thinking
2. Your understanding of businesses as interdisciplinary units
3. Your problem solving and decisional abilities, and
4. Your effective communication and writing skills
5. Your core business knowledge
To this end, students will be required to individually analyze a case and submit a written report for evaluation by the due date indicated in the syllabus.
Assignment
You have been hired as a consultant to help Ford Motor Company return to its glory days, when either Henry Ford or Alan Mulally ran the company. In doing so, you must produce a short report to Jim Hackett, Ford’s CEO, that conveys your observations of Ford’s current situation (situational analysis), and a proposal of strategic actions Ford should take to be the model automotive company of the 21st century. Thus, you task is to answer the following questions based solely on the information provided in the case:
1. Perform an analysis of Ford’s external and internal environments. As you do this, please make sure you organize your response by classifying external trends as opportunities and threats, and by classifying Ford’s internal environment as strengths and weaknesses. Because of the length of the report, select the most salient issues in your eyes. In addition, you must include at least three functional areas/value chain activities in your analysis of Ford’s internal environment (e.g., operations, marketing, and finance), and you must include issues regarding Ford’s financial situation.
2. Based on the external challenges (threats), positive external trends (opportunities), Ford’s limitations (weaknesses), and Ford’s strong suits (strengths) identified in point #1, provide 4 strategic suggestions for Ford’s executives to implement. In other words, combine opportunities/threats you identified, with Ford’s strengths/weaknesses in order to make suggestions on what decisions CEO Hackett needs to make. In your response, make sure you include both strategic actions related to business level strategy (how to compete) and corporate -level strategy (where to compete). Provide strong rationale for your choices.
Expectations
The analysis of the case should reflect both your understanding of the material covered in the text as well as other insights you have gained from other functional area courses. You are encouraged to approach the case with an integrated multi-functional perspective of the organization and to explicate recommendations clearly and concisely in writing. There are multiple possible answers to the questions provided. Use the critical thinking and problem solving skills you have developed through your university career.
Individual case analysis write-ups should be well thought out and not trivial. Answers should stick to the facts in the case and analysis. Provide strong reasoning and evidence from the case.
All individual case analysis reports are due through the Assignments tab on Canvas. All case reports will be put through Unicheck, a plagiarism tool. The expectation is that you submit your own work. Any plagiriasm will be punished to the greatest extent. If your analysis is found to be a copy of someone else’s work, you will earn a ZERO in your individual case analysis grade and you will be sent to the Office of Student Conduct.
Format
The case analysis report should be prepared using single-space, Times New Roman 12-point font, and a 1-inch all-around margin. The case analysis report should be 3 pages or less in length.
Please provide a cover page (not counted in the 3 pages) with your name, the title of the case, the name of the course, the course section, and the date.
Any direct quotes form the case should appear in quotes and the page number should appear in parenthesis.
Individual Case Analysis Rubric (Total points=100)
Criteria Ratings Points
a. Question 1 – Internal and external analysis
Description: The report provides both Internal (5) and external analyses (5). 10.0 pts
Excellent 8.0 pts
Good 6.0 pts
OK 4.0 pts
Needs work 2.0 pts
Weak 0.0 pts
No marks 10 pts
b. Question 1 – Categorizes trends
Description: The report categorizes internal issues as weaknesses (2.5), and strengths (2.5); and categorizes external issues as opportunities (3) and threats (2). 10.0 pts
Excellent 8.0 pts
Good 6.0 pts
OK 4.0 pts
Needs work 2.0 pts
Weak 0.0 pts
No marks 10 pts
c. Question 1 – Provides a multi-functional analysis
Description: In the analysis of the internal environments, the report includes issues regarding at least 3 different functional areas (6), the report includes the financial health of the organization (4). 10.0 pts
Excellent 8.0 pts
Good 6.0 pts
OK 4.0 pts
Needs work 2.0 pts
Weak 0.0 pts
No marks 10 pts
d. Question 2 – Strategic action 1
Description: The report recommends a strategic action to the CEO that combines a weakness/strength with an opportunity/threat (2). The report provides strong rationale for the merits of strategic action 1 (8). 10.0 pts
Excellent 8.0 pts
Good 6.0 pts
OK 4.0 pts
Needs work 2.0 pts
Weak 0.0 pts
No marks 10 pts
e. Question 2 – Strategic action 2
Description: The report recommends a strategic action to the CEO that combines a weakness/strength with an opportunity/threat (2). The report provides strong rationale for the merits of strategic action 1 (8). 10.0 pts
Excellent 8.0 pts
Good 6.0 pts
OK 4.0 pts
Needs work 2.0 pts
Weak 0.0 pts
No marks 10 pts
f. Question 2 – Strategic action 3
Description: The report recommends a strategic action to the CEO that combines a weakness/strength with an opportunity/threat (2). The report provides strong rationale for the merits of strategic action 1 (8). 10.0 pts
Excellent 8.0 pts
Good 6.0 pts
OK 4.0 pts
Needs work 2.0 pts
Weak 0.0 pts
No marks 10 pts
g. Question 2 – Strategic action 4
Description: The report recommends a strategic action to the CEO that combines a weakness/strength with an opportunity/threat (2). The report provides strong rationale for the merits of strategic action 1 (8). 10.0 pts
Excellent 8.0 pts
Good 6.0 pts
OK 4.0 pts
Needs work 2.0 pts
Weak 0.0 pts
No marks 10 pts
h. Question 2 – Strategic actions recommended are both at the Business-level and at the corporate level
Description: The report recommends at least one strategic action at the business-level (how to compete) (5) and at least one action at the corporate level (where to compete) (5). 10.0 pts
Excellent 8.0 pts
Good 6.0 pts
OK 4.0 pts
Needs work 2.0 pts
Weak 0.0 pts
No marks 10 pts
i. Writing and Communication Skills – Message, Grammar and Spelling
Description: The report fully answers the questions using business core knowledge (5), is written in complete sentences (2), with appropriate English grammar (2) and spelling (1). 10.0 pts
Excellent 8.0 pts
Good 6.0 pts
OK 4.0 pts
Needs work 2.0 pts
Weak 0.0 pts
No marks 10 pts
j. Writing and Communication Skills – Format Guidelines
Description: The report followed the guidelines provided. It is single-spaced (1), 1-inch margins(1), 3 pages long (7), 12-point-times New Roman (1). 10.0 pts
Excellent 8.0 pts
Good 6.0 pts
OK 4.0 pts
Needs work 2.0 pts
Weak 0.0 pts
No marks 10 pts

Case Study Sample Content Preview:
Student’s Name
Instructor
Course Title
Date
Ford Case: An Auto Company in Transition
For Ford to remain competitive, the company has been forced to reestablish incentives for natural speculators as competition from them threatened to destabilize the company further. Ford made a lot of tough decisions, including picking the proper pioneer to lead the company. Chairman Bill Ford states the current era is one of unprecedented transformation. Furthermore, this is a remarkable period of transition. Therefore inventories must adapt to meet the fluctuating needs of self-sufficient cars. Ford wants to send a signal to all of its divisions to maintain harmony and individuals are expected to collaborate and work towards a common purpose or objective. Ford's innovative approach to manufacturing advances the industry for everyone. There are a lot of financial factors affecting the productivity of the company. This is difficult to foresee since the economic and social situation is always shifting. Likewise, unexpected situations may give rise to new rivals.
When analyzing the internal and external issues of Ford, it is also important to analyze the financial situation considering the fact that the company depends so much on the United States Market. As a result, the company ends up making losses. Compared to other markets in Europe and Japan, Ford is an inferior brand and lacks a good reputation. This means that it is impossible for the company to increase its earnings in these markets. Over the past few years, the profitability ratios of the company have been declining. For example, the return on investment of Ford from 2015 to 2019 declined, but since then, it has been increasing gradually. For example, it dropped from 11/47% in 2015 to 6.20% in 2019. It is worth noting that Investors praised the automaker's plans for new EV vehicles, which helped the stock of Ford soar to 136% in 2021. However, Ford's stock has fared poorly in 2022, falling to 44%. This is partly because of the increase in 2021, and it's also because of the bad stock market in light of the general state of the world economy.
Further, Ford Automotive reported revenue amounting to $70.20 billion for the first half of the fiscal year 2022 and $37.90 billion for the second quarter. This is an increase from $24.12 billion and $57.68 billion in the corresponding quarter of the fiscal year 2021, respectively. It is important to note that at the end of the second quarter of the fiscal year 2022, Ford had reported revenues of $74.66 billion. However, the business also recorded a net loss of $2.44 billion and an inclusive loss of $512 million. During the first half of 2022, Ford experienced a comprehensive loss of $3.57 million after all expenses the company had incurred were factored in. The decline in value of Vivian was responsible for the loss. This is because Vivian is a car manufacturer in which Ford owns a 12% share.
Internal Environment
Ford Strengths
Ford is a well-known brand in the automobile industry and is also known for its success in marketing and advertising. In 2021, the brand value of the company was $10.44 billion. Additionally, it is the second-largest automaker in the United States. For example, in 2021, the company sold more than 4 mill...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now